Indiana Jones Behind-The-Scenes

    POSTED BY Charlie Schneider, 21 May 2008

     


     

    Here's a cool list of behind-the-scenes factoids that you may not have known about the Indiana Jones Series courtesty of Telegrap.co.uk

    1. Tom Selleck was George Lucas's original choice for the role but had to turn it down due to his commitment to the US TV series Magnum PI.

    2. Indiana Jones was actually Indiana Smith until the first day of shooting.

    3. The famous scene in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom where Indy shoots the man dramatically wielding a scimitar was improvised by Harrison Ford. It is rumoured he was suffering from piles and didn't want to do the extended fight scene that was planned.

    4. Sean Connery, who played Indy's father in The Last Crusade, is only 12 years older than Harrison Ford.

    5. Renowned British wrestler and Auf Wiedersehen Pet star Pat Roach was killed twice in Raiders of the Lost Ark (as a Sherpa in the bar fight and as the Nazi pugilist who meets the wrong end of a propeller) and is pushed into a rock crusher in Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.

    6. Harrison Ford got his distinctive chin scar in a car crash in his 20s.

    7. R2-D2 and C3PO, the robots from Star Wars, can be seen in the hieroglyphics in the Well of Souls in Raiders of the Lost Ark.

    8. The "chilled monkey-brains" in Temple of Doom were actually made from custard and raspberry sauce.

    9. Steven Spielberg and George Lucas play missionaries in the airport at the start of Temple of Doom.

    10. Indiana Jones' horse in The Last Crusade was also John Rambo's horse in Rambo III.

     

    For some extra reading pleasure, here's a link to much much more Indiana Jones Trivia.

    See you all in line tonight! Bring something to do, it's going to be long.

    movies, Indiana Jones, Steven Spielberg, Harrison Ford, Crystal Skull, Last Crusade, Trivia, Temple of Doom, George Lucas

    Comments

    • Bombardem wrote on May 21, 1:55 pm

      The reviews I've seen cover the full spectrum from loved it to hated it. Not having seen it, my interpretation of the reviews is this: It sounds like the film is a re-hash of all the stunts, jokes, and gags in the previous films, without much chemistry between the actors til late in the film. But its still fun.
      http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/indianajones4

      I'm sure the film is good fun. On name recognition alone it should beat Prince Caspian out of the #1 spot.

    • Steven J. Vasquez (guest) wrote on May 21, 2:40 pm

      It's the fun aspect that is the main reason I'll go and see this flick. It's the same reason that I've seen any of them and I've yet to be disappointed, so far. I'm hoping that will hold up with the new one.

      I'M ON THIS MOVIE LIKE LINDSAY LOHAN ON A VODKA BOTTLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Recent episodes